Biological Psychology Links

By GUY DEUTSCHER Seventy years ago, in 1940, a popular science magazine published a short article that set in motion one of the trendiest intellectual fads of the 20th century. At first glance, there seemed little about the article to augur its subsequent celebrity. Neither the title, “Science and Linguistics,” nor the magazine, M.I.T.’s Technology Review, was most people’s idea of glamour. And the author, a chemical engineer who worked for an insurance company and moonlighted as an anthropology lecturer at Yale University, was an unlikely candidate for international superstardom. And yet Benjamin Lee Whorf let loose an alluring idea about language’s power over the mind, and his stirring prose seduced a whole generation into believing that our mother tongue restricts what we are able to think. In particular, Whorf announced, Native American languages impose on their speakers a picture of reality that is totally different from ours, so their speakers would simply not be able to understand some of our most basic concepts, like the flow of time or the distinction between objects (like “stone”) and actions (like “fall”). For decades, Whorf’s theory dazzled both academics and the general public alike. In his shadow, others made a whole range of imaginative claims about the supposed power of language, from the assertion that Native American languages instill in their speakers an intuitive understanding of Einstein’s concept of time as a fourth dimension to the theory that the nature of the Jewish religion was determined by the tense system of ancient Hebrew. Eventually, Whorf’s theory crash-landed on hard facts and solid common sense, when it transpired that there had never actually been any evidence to support his fantastic claims. The reaction was so severe that for decades, any attempts to explore the influence of the mother tongue on our thoughts were relegated to the loony fringes of disrepute. But in the last few years, new research has revealed that when we learn our mother tongue, we do after all acquire certain habits of thought that shape our experience in significant and often surprising ways. Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

by Carl Zimmer Every spring the National Football League conducts that most cherished of American rituals, the college draft. A couple of months before the event, prospective players show off their abilities in an athletic audition known as the combine. Last winter’s combine was different from that of previous years, though. Along with the traditional 40-yard dashes and bench presses, the latest crop of aspirants also had to log time in front of a computer, trying to solve a series of brainteasers. In one test, Xs and Os were sprinkled across the computer screen as the athletes took a test that measured how well they could remember the position of each letter. In another, words like red and blue appeared on the screen in different colors. The football players had to press a key as quickly as possible if the word matched its color. These teasers are not intended to help coaches make their draft picks. They are for the benefit of the players themselves—or, to be more precise, for the benefit of the players’ gray matter. Under pressure from Congress, the N.F.L. is taking steps to do a better job of protecting its players from brain damage. The little computer challenges that the draft candidates had to solve measure some of the brain’s most crucial functions, such as its ability to hold several pieces of information at once. Given the nature of football, it is extremely likely that a number of this year’s draft picks will someday suffer a head injury on the field. After that happens, N.F.L. doctors will give them the same tests again. By comparing the new results with the baseline scores recorded just before the draft, the doctors will get a clearer sense of how badly the football players have damaged their brains and what degree of caution to take during recovery.

By Kay Lazar New research suggests that athletes who have had multiple head injuries, and possibly others such as military veterans exposed to repetitive brain traumas, may be prone to developing a disabling neurological disease similar to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease. A team of researchers from Boston University School of Medicine and the Veterans Administration Hospital in Bedford said yesterday they have pinpointed evidence of a new disease that mimics ALS in the brains of two former National Football League players previously thought to have died of ALS. They also found the new disease in the brain of a deceased professional boxer who was a military veteran. In most cases, ALS strikes people — many in the prime of life — with no apparent rhyme or reason. The progressive nerve disorder, which affects an estimated 30,000 Americans, slowly paralyzes patients while leaving their mind intact. But if this early research is borne out by autopsies of additional athletes and veterans, it would support the idea that an ALS-type illness can be triggered by the traumas of sports and war. “We believe that these three cases are the tip of the iceberg,’’ said neurosurgeon Robert Cantu, who is a codirector of the BU Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy. “We don’t know whether this is linked to the increased incidence of ALS in the military, who are subject to blasts and other head injuries, but we are concerned that it may be.’’ The findings, the authors speculated, could mean that athletes and some others previously diagnosed with ALS actually had the related syndrome — perhaps even Gehrig himself, the New York Yankees star who is the iconic ALS sufferer. It’s a mystery that will never be solved, however, because Gehrig’s body was cremated. © 2010 NY Times Co

By Steve Yanda Across the spectrum of athletics from youth soccer to the National Football League, concussions are one of the most worrisome of injuries: hard to diagnose and even harder to know when an athlete has recovered. Now, in an unusual combination of real sports and their digital imitators, a handful of colleges, including the University of Maryland, are turning to a video game for help. Athletic trainers in College Park and on other campuses are using the Wii Fit video game as an objective and practical -- if unproven -- method of assessing athletes' balance, an important yardstick for determining recovery from concussion. For the past year, Maryland and Ohio State have partnered to conduct research into the reliability of Wii Fit -- an exercise video game played on Nintendo's Wii console, which allows for physical interaction between player and game -- as an effective concussion management instrument. Darryl Conway, Maryland's head athletic trainer, said this will be the third year the school has used components of the game to conduct baseline testing of its athletes' balance. Proponents of using Wii Fit as a tool to examine concussions praise its simplicity and affordability -- not to mention its popularity with student-athletes. "The athletes love it because what we've done is we've incorporated this fun game that they're playing at home into their rehab system," said Tamerah Hunt, director of research at the Ohio State Sports Concussion Program. "But they're also enjoying it at a time when they're injured or at a time when their spirits are down, and they have to come into the athletic training room every day and they have to get all this treatment . . . and it's kind of a reaction of, 'Oh, this is fun.' " © 2010 The Washington Post Company

By Carolyn Y. Johnson In the ever-expanding world of medical devices, early adopters have a new option: a robotic arm. A Cambridge start-up, Myomo Inc., is making an expensive stroke therapy available directly to patients, an effort to encourage use of the novel device. The Myomo arm, based on technology developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is in many ways a natural extension of research that has shown repetitive-exercise therapy can help stroke patients regain movement. The lightweight prosthesis straps onto the arm and reads signals from the muscles to give a patient an assist when he or she moves the limb. But there is no rigorous scientific evidence demonstrating how well it works. And the $7,000 device casts a spotlight on the hard-to-navigate world of rehabilitation devices — in which patients who are often desperate face a growing number of products whose effectiveness is still being determined. “While there’s some suggestive, tiny studies — that are really pilot studies — that it might be useful, there’s no proof of efficacy using the usual criteria,’’ said Dr. Joel Stein, chairman of the rehabilitation and regenerative medicine department at Columbia University. He is also on Myomo’s scientific advisory board. “I’ve worked with many stroke patients through the years, and I’m careful to not be too paternalistic deciding for them. . . . They feel like the medical system has given up on them, and there’s a fine line between not over-promising and saying we have nothing shown to be helpful, therefore you should just give up.’’ © 2010 NY Times Co

By Emily Anthes One of the first things that anatomy students learn is that the brain is divided down the center. In most people, one half, or hemisphere, plays a dominant role. Handedness has long been a crude measure of hemispheric dominance, because each side of the brain controls the opposite side of the body. Right-handers, for instance, are likely to have dominant left hemispheres. Today researchers are realizing that studying ambidextrous children (who have no dominant hand) could yield insights into the consequences of an unusually symmetrical brain. A team of European researchers recently assessed nearly 8,000 Finnish children and showed that mixed-handed children are at increased risk for linguistic, scholastic and attention-related difficulties. At age eight, mixed-handed kids were about twice as likely to have language and academic difficulties as their peers. By the time the children were 16, they also were twice as likely to have symptoms of ADHD—and their symptoms were more severe than those of right- or left-handed students. Ambidexterity is not causing these problems. Rather “handedness is really a very crude measure of how the brain is working,” says Alina Rodriguez, a clinical psychologist at King’s College London and the study’s lead author. In typical brains, language is rooted in the left hemisphere, and networks that control attention are anchored in the right—but brains without a dominant hemisphere may be working and communicating differently. © 2010 Scientific American,

By Rachel Ehrenberg Not so long ago, Mozart mania swept the nation. A small study found that students who listened to 10 minutes of a Mozart sonata performed better on a paper-folding task than their peers, and suddenly a flourishing industry sprouted. Mozart’s music sang from CDs and videos marketed for children, babies and moms-to-be. The craze reached a crescendo when Georgia’s governor Zell Miller included $105,000 in his state budget to send every child born in a Georgia hospital home with a classical music tape or CD. “No one questions that listening to music at a very early age affects the spatial, temporal reasoning that underlies math and engineering and even chess,” Miller said. Actually, a lot of researchers questioned the link between listening to music and smarts. In the original study, the “Mozart effect” was minor and lasted only minutes. Follow-up studies found the effect specific neither to the composer nor to music. Students listening to Mozart were just more stimulated than those listening to a relaxation tape or silence. And while arousal can improve learning, research suggests, the effects can be fleeting and aren’t limited to music. Assessments of the original report now tend to be dirges: In the May-June issue of Intelligence, researchers from the University of Vienna published a paper titled “Mozart effect–Shmozart effect.” “It’s a short-lived effect and it spawned a huge industry of baby Einstein, baby Mozart CDs, all sorts of stuff,” says Aniruddh Patel of the Neurosciences Institute in San Diego. “But the science behind it is pretty thin.” © Society for Science & the Public 2000 - 2010

By ALAN SCHWARZ The National Football League is producing a poster that bluntly alerts its players to the long-term effects of concussions, using words like “depression” and “early onset of dementia” that those close to the issue described as both staggering and overdue. The poster, soon to be hung in locker rooms leaguewide, becomes by far the N.F.L.’s most definitive statement on the cognitive risks of football, which it had discredited for most of the past several years as academic studies and reports of deceased players’ brain damage mounted. The new document also warns players that repeated concussions “can change your life and your family’s life forever,” a clear nod to retired players’ wives who have spoken out on the issue, occasionally before Congress. A draft of the poster also features photographs of unnamed youngsters in various sports with the reminder, “Other athletes are watching.” The new poster, which will also become a brochure given to all players, presents a stark change in league approach. It replaces a pamphlet given since 2007 that said, “Current research with professional athletes has not shown that having more than one or two concussions leads to permanent problems if each injury is treated properly,” and also left open the question of “if there are any long-term effects of concussion in N.F.L. athletes.” Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company

by Michael Balter Why does human conversation come so easily? A new study chalks it up to a sort of "mind meld" between participants. Researchers have found that the brains of speakers and listeners become synchronized as they converse and that this "neural coupling" is key to effective communication. Scientists have traditionally considered talking and listening to be two independent processes. The idea is that speech is produced in some parts of the brain, including a region known as Broca's area, and understood in others, including a region known as Wernicke's area. But recent studies suggest that there's actually much more overlap. For example, partners in a conversation will unconsciously begin imitating each other, adopting similar grammatical structures, speaking rates, and even bodily postures. This overlap helps people establish a "common ground" during conversation and may even help them predict what the other is going to say next, argue psychologist Martin Pickering of the University of Edinburgh and psychologist Simon Garrod of the University of Glasgow, both in the United Kingdom. Some researchers think that so-called mirror neurons, which fire when one individual observes the actions of another, might be involved in these interactions. To test some of these hypotheses, a team led by Princeton University psychologist Uri Hasson used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare the brain activation patterns of speakers and listeners. Graduate student Lauren Silbert placed her head in an MRI machine and related a 15-minute, unrehearsed story about various adventures she had while in high school, which included two boys fighting over who was going to take her to the prom and an encounter with a police officer after a car accident. The team recorded Silbert's story, using a specially designed microphone that filtered out the loud noise of the MRI machine, and then played it back to 11 subjects while their brains were also scanned. © 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

By Marita Vera There is nothing more exhilarating for a boxing audience than to see a fighter hit the mat in a knockout. But being on the losing end of a KO punch can damage a lot more than a pugilist's pride—research suggests that the blows that cause knockouts can be debilitating to a boxer's short and long-term health. Repeated blows to the brain can cause chronic damage such as personality changes and dementia. If the punches have enough impact to cause uncontrollable brain swelling or hemorrhage, the fighter could even die. So what causes a knockout? Concussions, and lots of them. While it often seems as though the effect is caused by a single well-placed shot, it is usually the result of many quick punches. Each punch creates a concussion (technically defined as any head injury that causes a disruption of neurological function), and each concussion brings the boxer closer to a state of darkness. Here's how it happens: The body contains dissolved sodium, potassium and calcium, collectively known as electrolytes, which are responsible for conducting impulses along neurons. Every time a fighter receives a blow to a nerve, potassium leaves the cell and calcium rushes in, destabilizing the electrolyte balance, while the brain does all it can to keep these levels in balance. With each successive blow, this balance becomes harder and harder to maintain, and more and more energy must be spent in the process. When the body reaches the point where the damage outweighs the body's ability to repair itself, the brain shuts down to conserve enough energy to fix the injured neurons at a later point. ©2010 Hearst Communication, Inc.

Janelle Weaver A tool that automatically assesses young children's vocalizations should enable faster and more objective measures of language learning in natural environments than current methods allow. And its developers claim that the new tool may also help the early detection of autism by detecting speech abnormalities associated with it. The new method will allow scientists to assess more quickly how children develop speech and language in response to the talk they hear around them, says Kim Oller of the University of Memphis in Tennessee, whose team published its work today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1. Because past investigations of language development in natural settings have been hindered by the time-consuming transcription of audio recordings, "their approach could change the field of language development research," says Dorothy Bishop, an expert in developmental language disorders at the University of Oxford, UK. The objective measure of vocal quality could also help to detect speech abnormalities and autism in children, the authors suggest. Previous research has shown that children with Autism Spectrum Disorder have unusual articulation and prosody (patterns of rhythm and sound), but standard diagnostic tests do not cite specific vocal deficiencies. Quantifying vocal abnormalities in autistic children and translating them into a diagnostic procedure has been challenging, says Gordon Ramsay, a speech scientist at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. "One of the great goals for years now has been to find objective measures of characteristics or behaviours that can be used to diagnose autism," he says. "This study is the first application of objective measures to detect autism based on speech." © 2010 Nature Publishing Group,

by Kate Douglas "What are you laughing at?" Ignoring any aggressive intent, the answer is obvious: I am laughing because something you said amused me. Right? Wrong. According to a classic study of laughter by Robert Provine of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and his colleagues, laughter is an unexpectedly serious business. Observing the human animal in its natural habitat - the shopping mall - they documented 1200 instances of laughter, and found that only 10 to 20 per cent of them were responses to anything remotely resembling a joke. Most laughter was in fact either triggered by a banal comment or used to punctuate everyday speech. Furthermore, says Provine in his book Laughter: A scientific investigation, we are 50 per cent more likely to laugh when speaking than when listening, and 30 times gigglier in a social setting than when alone without a social surrogate such as a television. Provine's conclusion was that the essential ingredient for laughter is not a joke but another person. Laughter is far more general than just a response to humour: it is a social glue that we use in all sorts of ways to bind ourselves together. As such, it comes in many guises. Our first laughs occur at between 2 and 6 months of age - even in deaf babies. They are triggered by surprise in a safe situation (think peek-a-boo), and don't just endear babies to their parents. Since laughter is associated with activity in the brain's dopamine reward circuitry, it encourages babies to explore the world by making them feel happy and safe. When infants begin to engage in rough-and-tumble play, laughter signals that the intentions are not serious, allowing children to test physical and social boundaries without serious jeopardy. © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

by Linda Geddes, Amsterdam THE discovery of an antibody that binds to certain brain receptors could reduce the side effects of a common stroke drug and buy additional time in which to use it. The preferred treatment for ischaemic stroke, in which a blood clot cuts off the blood supply to brain tissue, is a drug called rtPA, which dissolves the clot. However, that drug has to be given within the first few of hours of a stroke, otherwise the risks of treatment outweigh the benefits. Dissolving the clot can lead to a sudden rise in blood pressure, increasing the chance that a blood vessel will rupture and bleed into the brain. Only 5 to 10 per cent of people who suffer a stroke make it to hospital early enough to be treated with rtPA, says Denis Vivien of the University of Caen Basse-Normandie in France. The rest are given drugs that do not destroy the initial clot but reduce the chance of further clots forming. One reason for a delay in administering rtPA is that a brain scan must be carried out to determine the nature of the stroke. People with haemorrhagic stroke, in which a blood vessel in the brain bursts, should not receive rtPA as it increases the risk of bleeding. Now a startling discovery by Vivien has put a different perspective on this relatively simple picture: rtPA is actually released by brain cells. "This was completely unexpected," he says. © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

by Linda Geddes, Amsterdam When children learn to read and write, they often get things back to front: confusing the letters "b" and "d", and sometimes even writing their entire names in the mirror image. This strange phenomenon might be a consequence of children "recycling" an area of the brain that recognises shapes and patterns as they learn to read, says Stanislas Dehaene of INSERM, the National Institute of Health and Medical Research in Saclay, France. Previous studies in macaques have shown that individual neurons in an area of the brain's left hemisphere fire in response to pictures and patterns. We also know that animals and human infants alike find it hard to distinguish between mirror images of the same picture. Still other studies have established that this brain region, called the visual word form area (VWFA), is activated as people learn to read. To investigate what happens in the VWFA when humans look at words and pictures and their mirror images, Dehaene used functional magnetic resonance imaging to record the brain activity of adults when they were shown pictures, written words and letters both in the normal and the reverse orientation. © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

The undersea world isn't as quiet as we thought, according to a New Zealand researcher who found fish can "talk" to each other. Fish communicate with noises including grunts, chirps and pops, University of Auckland marine scientist Shahriman Ghazali has discovered according to newspaper reports Wednesday. "All fish can hear, but not all can make sound -- pops and other sounds made by vibrating their swim bladder, a muscle they can contract," Ghazali told the New Zealand Herald. Fish are believed to communicate with each other for different reasons, including attracting mates, scaring off predators or orienting themselves. The gurnard species has a wide vocal repertoire and keeps up a constant chatter, Ghazali found after studying different species of fish placed into tanks. On the other hand, cod usually kept silent, except when they were spawning. "The hypothesis is that they are using sound as a synchronization so that the male and female release their eggs at the same time for fertilization," he said. Some reef fish, such as the damselfish, made sounds to attempt to scare off threatening fish and even divers, he said. But anyone hoping to strike up a conversation with their pet goldfish is out of luck. © 2010 Discovery Communications, LLC.

By TARA PARKER-POPE Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone (Applied Cognitive Psychology) Researchers at Western Washington University decided to study whether pedestrians engrossed in a phone conversation would notice obvious events around them. “I was trying to think about what kind of distraction we could put out there, and I talked to this student who had a unicycle,” said Ira E. Hyman Jr., a professor of psychology. “He said, ‘What’s more, I own a clown suit.’ You don’t have a student who unicycles in a clown suit every day, so you have to take advantage of these things.” The student, Dustin Randall, donned the suit — purple and yellow, with polka-dot sleeves, red shoes and a red nose — then hopped on the unicycle and pedaled around a square. After pedestrians crossed the square, researchers asked them, “Did you see anything unusual?” Among pedestrians who were listening to music or walking alone, 1 in 3 replied that they had just seen a clown on a unicycle, according to a report on the study, in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology. Nearly 60 percent of those who were walking with a friend mentioned the clown. But among people who had been talking on a cellphone, the figure was 8 percent. When the pedestrians were asked, “Did you see the unicycling clown?” the rates rose — to as high as 71 percent for people walking with a friend. But among those who had been talking on a cellphone, just 25 percent said they had. TARA PARKER-POPE Sign in to Recommend Next Article in Health (12 of 43) » A version of this article appeared in print on October 27, 2009, on page D6 of the New York edition. Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company

Children who are poor readers appear to have a disruption in the part of their brain involved in reading phonetically, according to a sophisticated brain imaging study funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The study also found that children who read poorly but who do not receive any extra help or training eventually compensate for their disability by using other parts of the brain as backup systems for the impaired brain regions. Although most of these children eventually do learn to read, they never do so with the same fluency as do good readers. This is probably because the "backup" brain systems they use when reading apparently cannot process printed information as easily as can the brain systems primarily involved in reading. The researchers, led by Bennett Shaywitz, M.D., of the Yale University School of Medicine, published their results in the July Biological Psychiatry.

DALLAS, – Moderate elevations of homocysteine are associated with a more than five-fold increase in the risk for stroke and almost triple the risk for Alzheimer's disease, according to research in the October issue of Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association. Homocysteine is an amino acid believed to be toxic to blood vessels. Several studies have linked high blood levels of it to increased heart attack risk. This study found that homocysteine levels in patients with stroke, Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia were consistently higher than homocysteine levels in age-matched healthy volunteers. "Since B vitamins and foods fortified with folate can reduce homocysteine levels, this study suggests that B vitamin supplementation may be appropriate for most adults. It warrants a large placebo-controlled study of folate, and vitamins B6 and B12 in people at risk from dementia and stroke," says lead author Stephen P. McIlroy, Ph.D., a lecturer in geriatric medicine at Queen's University in Belfast, Ireland. Copyright © 1995-2002 ScienceDaily Magazine

Dr. Cesario V. Borlongan, neuroscientist, is trying to determine if a compound that is elevated in hibernating squirrels can one day help avoid the ravages of stroke and Parkinson's disease.] A compound that enables squirrels to hibernate may one day help minimize brain damage that results from stroke, according to a researcher at the Medical College of Georgia and Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Augusta. In an animal model for stroke, delta opioid peptide reduced by as much as 75 percent the damage to the brain’s striatum, the deeper region of the brain and a major target for strokes, according to Dr. Cesario V. Borlongan, neuroscientist. In fact, evidence suggests that the compound, which puts cells in a temporary state of suspended animation, may help protect brain cells from the ravages of Parkinson’s disease as well. Copyright 2002 Medical College of Georgia. All rights reserved.

Aficionados may not only treat their automobiles as if they are people, but it now appears that they recognize their cars with the special part of the brain that is also used to identify faces. And, when they try to identify cars and faces at the same time, they are likely to experience a kind of perceptual traffic jam. Those are some of the implications of research conducted at Vanderbilt University and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Researchers there compared how the brains of auto experts and novices process pictures of cars and faces. They found that viewing cars elicits signals from the brains of car experts that are just like the signals evoked by viewing faces in other brains. Moreover, the experts' skill interfered with their ability to identify faces when they were forced to process cars and faces simultaneously. The findings, reported online on March 10 in the journal Nature Neuroscience, directly challenge the widely held view that a small, specialized area in the brain is specially hardwired to recognize faces. When confronted with a novel object, people use different parts of the brain to identify it by breaking it down into pieces. By contrast, the special facial recognition area appears to recognize faces holistically, all at one time, and does so more quickly than the piecemeal approach.

Chapter 19. Language and Cognition